Comparison

Cervinia vs Saas-Fee: which has more reliable snow?

Cervinia or Saas-Fee? Natural snow month by month, at the village, mid-mountain and summit, from thirty winters of weather data.

The season at a glance

CerviniaItaly, 2,050–3,480 mSaas-FeeSwitzerland, 1,800–3,600 m

Each cell is one month: the share of days with 30 cm or more of modelled natural snow at mid-mountain over the last 30 winters, from brown (often thin) to deep blue (snow-sure). Blank means almost none.

The short answer

Very little separates them: both have been snow-sure at mid-mountain in 7 months of the year over the last 30 winters.

Month by month

November: Cervinia 24 of 30, Saas-Fee 25 of 30 snow-sure winters (91% and 94% of days).

December: Cervinia 30 of 30, Saas-Fee 30 of 30 snow-sure winters (100% and 100% of days).

January: Cervinia 30 of 30, Saas-Fee 30 of 30 snow-sure winters (100% and 100% of days).

February: Cervinia 30 of 30, Saas-Fee 30 of 30 snow-sure winters (100% and 100% of days).

March: Cervinia 30 of 30, Saas-Fee 30 of 30 snow-sure winters (100% and 100% of days).

April: Cervinia 30 of 30, Saas-Fee 30 of 30 snow-sure winters (100% and 100% of days).

May: Cervinia 30 of 30, Saas-Fee 30 of 30 snow-sure winters (100% and 100% of days).

A snow-sure winter is one where mid-mountain had 30 cm or more of modelled natural snow on at least 90% of that month’s days.

Height and terrain

Cervinia and Saas-Fee are 30 km apart as the crow flies. Cervinia first, then Saas-Fee: Village 2,050 m against 1,800 m; Mid-mountain 2,765 m against 2,700 m; Summit 3,480 m against 3,600 m.

In February, the village had 30 cm or more of natural snow on 100% of days at Cervinia and 99% at Saas-Fee.

Questions

Which has more reliable snow, Cervinia or Saas-Fee?

Very little separates them: both have been snow-sure at mid-mountain in 7 months of the year over the last 30 winters.

Which has better snow down to the village, Cervinia or Saas-Fee?

In February, Cervinia: its village had 30 cm or more of modelled natural snow on 100% of days, against 99%.

Does this include snowmaking?

No. These are modelled natural snow figures only, from ERA5 weather. Groomed pistes with snowmaking often ski better than this.

Snow is modelled from thirty winters of ERA5 weather data, natural snow only. It ignores snowmaking, grooming and wind, so use it to compare places, dates and heights, not as a guarantee. Always check local avalanche bulletins before going off-piste.

Weather: ERA5, contains modified Copernicus Climate Change Service information 2026. Live snowfall: Open-Meteo (open-meteo.com, CC BY 4.0). Terrain: AWS Terrain Tiles. Basemap: OpenFreeMap, © OpenMapTiles. Ski areas, pistes and lifts: OpenSkiMap, © OpenStreetMap contributors (ODbL). Satellite view: Sentinel-2 cloudless 2016 by EOX (CC BY 4.0).

© 2026 Methodis Ltd