Comparison

Garmisch-Partenkirchen vs Obergurgl: which has more reliable snow?

Garmisch-Partenkirchen or Obergurgl? Natural snow month by month, at the village, mid-mountain and summit, from thirty winters of weather data.

The season at a glance

Garmisch-PartenkirchenGermany, 720–2,050 mObergurglAustria, 1,793–3,080 m

Each cell is one month: the share of days with 30 cm or more of modelled natural snow at mid-mountain over the last 30 winters, from brown (often thin) to deep blue (snow-sure). Blank means almost none.

The short answer

Obergurgl has had the more reliable natural snow: mid-mountain was snow-sure in 5 months of the year, against 3 at Garmisch-Partenkirchen. Month by month, Obergurgl has the edge in November, December, January, February, March, April and May.

Month by month

November: Garmisch-Partenkirchen 0 of 30, Obergurgl 16 of 30 snow-sure winters (14% and 74% of days).

December: Garmisch-Partenkirchen 13 of 30, Obergurgl 28 of 30 snow-sure winters (63% and 98% of days).

January: Garmisch-Partenkirchen 24 of 30, Obergurgl 30 of 30 snow-sure winters (89% and 100% of days).

February: Garmisch-Partenkirchen 28 of 30, Obergurgl 30 of 30 snow-sure winters (95% and 100% of days).

March: Garmisch-Partenkirchen 26 of 30, Obergurgl 30 of 30 snow-sure winters (90% and 100% of days).

April: Garmisch-Partenkirchen 2 of 30, Obergurgl 29 of 30 snow-sure winters (39% and 99% of days).

May: Garmisch-Partenkirchen 0 of 30, Obergurgl 12 of 30 snow-sure winters (0% and 74% of days).

A snow-sure winter is one where mid-mountain had 30 cm or more of modelled natural snow on at least 90% of that month’s days.

Height and terrain

Garmisch-Partenkirchen and Obergurgl are 67 km apart as the crow flies. Garmisch-Partenkirchen first, then Obergurgl: Village 720 m against 1,793 m; Mid-mountain 1,385 m against 2,436 m; Summit 2,050 m against 3,080 m. Mapped downhill runs: Garmisch-Partenkirchen 38 km, Obergurgl 64 km (OpenStreetMap).

In February, the village had 30 cm or more of natural snow on 4% of days at Garmisch-Partenkirchen and 95% at Obergurgl.

Questions

Which has more reliable snow, Garmisch-Partenkirchen or Obergurgl?

Obergurgl has had the more reliable natural snow: mid-mountain was snow-sure in 5 months of the year, against 3 at Garmisch-Partenkirchen. Month by month, Obergurgl has the edge in November, December, January, February, March, April and May.

Which has better snow down to the village, Garmisch-Partenkirchen or Obergurgl?

In February, Obergurgl: its village had 30 cm or more of modelled natural snow on 95% of days, against 4%.

Does this include snowmaking?

No. These are modelled natural snow figures only, from ERA5 weather. Groomed pistes with snowmaking often ski better than this.

Snow is modelled from thirty winters of ERA5 weather data, natural snow only. It ignores snowmaking, grooming and wind, so use it to compare places, dates and heights, not as a guarantee. Always check local avalanche bulletins before going off-piste.

Weather: ERA5, contains modified Copernicus Climate Change Service information 2026. Live snowfall: Open-Meteo (open-meteo.com, CC BY 4.0). Terrain: AWS Terrain Tiles. Basemap: OpenFreeMap, © OpenMapTiles. Ski areas, pistes and lifts: OpenSkiMap, © OpenStreetMap contributors (ODbL). Satellite view: Sentinel-2 cloudless 2016 by EOX (CC BY 4.0).

© 2026 Methodis Ltd